<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Royal Dutch Shell plc .com &#187; Petro-China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com/tag/petro-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com</link>
	<description>News and information on Royal Dutch Shell Plc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Energy industry upheaval to benefit oil services</title>
		<link>http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/06/30/energy-industry-upheaval-to-benefit-oil-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/06/30/energy-industry-upheaval-to-benefit-oil-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Donovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gazprom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petro-China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Aramco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://royaldutchshellplc.com/?p=14220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some suggested that the international oil companies such as ExxonMobil, BP and Royal Dutch Shell would have to change their business model to become more like service companies if they were to prosper.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/06/30/energy-industry-upheaval-to-benefit-oil-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

